Monday, March 03, 2008

' Heavenly ' economic picture of BN backfires

To 'prove' that Malaysia still continues to 'progress', some 'heavenly' figures of economic growth have been released but for the ordinary people of all races, even if the figures are accurate, the question of why they remain to experience financial hardship in everyday lives is still very popularly raised (mengapa negara kaya tetapi rakyat masih miskin?). So, these 'rosy' economic figures could backfire in real life causing even deeper and more widespread discontents that would last long after the polling is over. Of course, the accuracy of these figures and the contexts of their presentation can still be critically assessed and contested by learned oppositionists and people's intellectuals.

BN's serious strategic blunder & vulnerability

3 Comments:

Blogger malaysia said...

中国报04032008,A2页 〉吴心一挑战陈国伟 〉向选民承诺增建华小.
吴心一呀吴心一,你知不知道其实你这一挑 - 挑起了华人的心痛!(难道增建华小不是国家政府应该承担的责任吗?)- 挑起了华总和董总的心痛!(华总和董总争取多年而徒劳无功的的心痛!) - 挑起了马华参与国阵40年的无用!(不能依据华人人口增建华小,保护不到白小,眼看大部分的华小学生们每年都需要父母亲捐钱,而国小却不必!)

星洲日报28022008,3页 〉马华争取成果,华小8年增12万学额。(为何华人需要争取学额?为何巫人却不需要争取学额?为何巫人的学额是依据人口增加?为何华人的学额不可依据人口而增加?)

请传信息给朋友:吴心一挑战陈国伟 〉向选民承诺增建华小.
吴心一呀吴心一,你知不知道其实你这一挑 - 挑起了华人的心痛!- 挑起了华总和董总的心痛! - 挑起了马华参与国阵40年的无用!

请传信息给朋友:星洲日报28022008,3页 〉马华争取成果,华小8年增12万学额。(为何华人需要争取学额?为何巫人却不需要争取学额?为何巫人的学额是依据人口增加?为何华人的学额不可依据人口而增加?)

10:00 AM  
Blogger yapchongyee said...

YAPCHONGYEE,
5a Prinsep Road, Attadale,
Western Australia.
Email :yapchongyee@yahoo.com.au,
Blogg :http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com



JUST TWO QUESTION FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI
& MR DAVID HOH


I have just responded to the TRIVIA & RAMBLINGS of the fevered mind of Mr David Hoh my wife’s counsel & solicitor. I have written a lot that charged Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali with criminal behaviour and with aiding & abetting the 3 criminals Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea Yoon.

In fact having written volumes on this subject, THE WHOLE STORY CAN BE SUMMED UP IN LAW BY JUST 2 QUESTIONS (1) For Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, and (2)A 2nd question for Mr David Hoh.

(1)QUESTION FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI :

DID YOU NOT APPROVE 2 CONFLICTING APPLICATIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS (A)1ST APPROVED THEIR APPLICATION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS; AND UPON ENFORCEMENT OF SAID ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS, YOU PROCEEDED FURTHER TO APPROVE TO RESPONDENTS AN ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT PETITION FOR ALLEGEDLY SHOWING NO CAUSE OF ACTION. You & respondents had ENFORCED THEIR SECURITY FOR COSTS BUT REFUSED TO ALLOW PETITIONER TO PROCEED TO TRIAL AS REQUIRED BY THE LAW OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

(2)QUESTION FOR Mr david hoh :

DID YOU NOT FAIL OR MORE LIKELY WITH HELD FILING A RESPONSE/DEFENSE TO DISMISS STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN’S nonsensical application to strike out said petition after HAVING ENFORCED RESPONDENTS’ ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS. No trial means no costs and security for costs means that petitioner’s money is set aside by the order for security for costs to FUCKING PAY FOR THE TRIAL IN CASE PETITIONER LOSE HER CASE.

It is that fucking simple and this Malaysian Federal Court Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali FUCKING APPROVED THE FUCKING ORDER FOR STRIKING OUT PETITION FOR SHOWING NO CAUSE OF ACTION. Is this not COMICAL, a fucking MALAYSIAN FEDERAL COURT JUDGE DOES NOT KNOW THE LAW.

Why has David Hoh (counsel for my wife) taken upon himself to DEFEND Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali ? He should be defending my wife ! I honestly can tell you why. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali IS NOT FUCKING FLUENT IN ENGLISH. She fucking cannot write and speak ENGLISH, therefore she gets David to defend her in a public forum.

Let it be known that Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is a serving Federal Court Judge of Malaysia; and I say it with absolute confidence that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is an illiterate and I have called her on many times & at many public Bloggsites and I have written on many occasions with copy of letters to all & sundry that Judge Zainon Binti Mohd. Ali acted in a criminal manner and committed several criminal offences while she acted as the presiding judge of my wife’s case.

It is fucking disgraceful that Mr David Hoh had to ambush me in his letter printed in the Malaysian Today website. I always send a copy of any letter that I write to anyone and every letter that I posted on my BLOGG was received by the person that I write about; that is to allow the person to reply; but David Hoh wrote to Malaysian Today on the 1st of July but he did not in any way make it known to me of his letter. Therefore, I did not get the opportunity to reply until yesterday when I checked my achieve on GOOGLE.COM 4 fucking months ! David you are a fucking coward and a chicken shit. Anyway, he bloggs on the Malaysia Today website and I cannot get access to that website because I cannot afford to subscribe to Malaysia Today.

However, to be fair David need to publish on a website that I can get to reply. He can go to my blogg, the CICAK, http://malay-sia.blogspot.com/2007/12/malaysia-is-3rd-rate-3rd-world.html, AND SEVERAL OTHER WEBSITES. David it is only decent to want a response from the person you write about.

PS. It is quite for you to inform Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali that I had called her a CRIMINAL. The phone No for A-G is 388889362 and the Phone No. for Chief Judge Malaya is 38888 4522

10:54 AM  
Blogger EH said...

For many people whose daily diet of reading is only newspaper headlines, those 'heavenly' figures could still temporarily register in their minds long enough to have some effects on their mood in the feverish atmosphere of GE. It is part of the more subtle propagandas of BN to woo fence sitters.

3:28 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home